| |
|
|
|
| For business information, annual reports, laws, ordinances, regulations and articles. |
|
|
|
B. FISCAL AND MONETARY
Chapter 6
Money and Credit
Introduction
An efficient financial system is assential for facilitating economic transactions and
contributing to growth and stability of the economy. By achieving and sustaining
macro-economic stability and by building better rule-based supervisory and regulatory
systems, government can lay the foundations for smoothly functioning financial system.
Pakistan, like other developing countries, has been implementing financial sector reform
as part of the overall economic liberalization programme since 1990 with a view to
improving the effectiveness of monetary policy, by making a shift from the direct to
indirect monetary control and greater reliance on market forces. The main financial
liberalization policies were aimed at liberalizing interest rates, reducing control on
credit, enhancing competition and efficiency in the financial system, and strengthening
the supervisory framework of the State Bank.
Prior to undertaking financial sector reforms the hallmark of Pakistan's financial sector
has been the direct controls on interest rates movements, domestic credit controls (bank
specific credit ceilings and selective credit allocations), high reserve requirements,
segmented financial markets, the absence of well-developed money and securities markets,
underdeveloped banking system, and commercial banks serving as captive institutions. In
particular, the policies of imposing ceilings on interest rates accompanied by directed
and rationed allocation of credit to "priority" sectors at low interest rates
had led to widespread "financial repression" in Pakistan. These policies were
seen to impede financial 'deepening' which, in turn, had weaken an important set of
impulses to foster economic growth.
Pakistan began to implement financial sector reforms at the end of 1989 with aims to (i)
removing distortions and segmentation of the financial markets by creating a homogeneous
market for government debt instruments in which all individuals and institutions could
participate; (ii) switching from an administered interest rate setting to market based
interest rate determination by initiating a regular auction programme of government debt;
(iii) allocating credit in response to market forces by gradually eliminating the directed
credit schemes and abolishing the subsidized credit schemes; (iv) creating and encouraging
the development of secondary market for government securities which is absolutely
essential for the success of auction programme of government debt; (v) strengthening the
health and competitiveness of the banking system by re-capitalizing and restructuring the
nationalized commercial banks, increasing their autonomy and accountability and allowing
private banks to enter the market; and (vi) improving prudential regulations and
supervision of all financial institutions.
Substantial progress has been made during 1990s in implementing banking sector reforms by
conducting monetary policy with market-based instruments, liberalizing interest rates,
restoring financial discipline through prudent lending, enhancing SBP's authority in
banking regulation and supervision, by improving the capital base and management of the
nationalized commercial banks, by stemming the hemorrhage caused by politically motivated
lending and operating losses by reducing over staffing and excessive numbers of branches
in the NCBs and DFIs through staff separation and branch closures policy, by improving
transparency through better prudential regulations and financial disclosure standards.
Credit Plan, 1999-2000
Credit Plan for the fiscal year 1999-2000 envisaged monetary expansion at 9.4 percent (Rs
121.0 billion) with Net Domestic Assets (NDA) and Net Foreign Assets (NFA) of the banking
system to grow by Rs 109 billion and Rs 12 billion respectively. Government sector was
projected to realize a retirement of Rs 15.0 billion on account of net budgetary
borrowings. Credit to the private sector and PSCEs was targeted to increase by Rs 104.5
billion after anticipated placement of Rupee equivalent of PSCEs, rescheduled foreign debt
of Rs 14.5 billion.
Monetary and Credit Development
Monetary expansion during July-March 1999-2000 was recorded at 3.2 percent (Rs 40.5
billion), compared with 3.5 percent (Rs 42.1 billion) in the same period last year. Net
Domestic Credit (NDA) of the banking system expanded by Rs 29.3 billion (2.2 percent),
compared with an increase of Rs 11.8 billion (0.9 percent) recorded last year. Net foreign
assets (NFA) of the banking system increased by Rs 11.2 billion, compared with a larger
flow of Rs 30.3 billion during the same period last year. The increase in NDA mainly
resulted from net credit expansion to the private sector, including PSCEs and rising
government budgetary borrowings.
The Government budgetary borrowings from the banking system increased by Rs 72.8 billion
on the gross basis. However, after they were adjusted for Rs 48.7 billion placed in
special-debt retirement account, net budgetary borrowing showed a rise of Rs 24.1 billion,
against a retirement of Rs 45.3 billion in the same period last year. Higher net bank
borrowing appeared to have arisen on the back of lower payments into the Special Account
with SBP, rather than due to an increase in gross borrowing for the period. The lower
retirement appears to be in line with the lower quantum of external debt rescheduling
applicable for the current fiscal year, compared to last year. Credit to government for
financing its commodity operations registered a retirement of Rs 17.9 billion, compared
with a retirement of 14.4 billion in the corresponding period last year.
Bank credit to private sector including PSCEs increased by Rs 36.9 billion during the
first nine months of the current fiscal year as against a credit expansion of Rs 70.6
billion in the comparable period of last year. While, credit to PSCEs showed an increase
of Rs 7.5 billion compared with Rs 1.9 billion in the same period last year the private
sector credit expanded by Rs 34.7 billion as against a credit expansion of Rs 68.8 billion
in the comparable period of last year.
A number of factors were responsible for the weak off-take by the private sector. Firstly,
the collapse in domestic prices of cotton has translated into a substantially reduced
credit requirement for this sector as a whole. According to industry sources, a
significant portion of purchases of raw cotton was deferred by textile units till
December, 1999 in order to take full advantage of the price collapse. Secondly, as a
result of low inflation, the overall credit requirement has remained low. Thirdly the
commercial banks were also playing safe and were over-cautious in extending loan to the
private sector. Other factors included imposition of margin restriction effective from
October 14, 1999 on all import letters of credit except for certain essential items to
save foreign exchange (the margin requirement was however, withdrawn with effect from
October 28, 1999), higher turnover of repayments to commercial banks, lower unit values of
exports in case of major export commodities depressing the demand for credit under export
finance scheme etc.
Credit to autonomous bodies showed a retirement of Rs 11.2 billion against an increase of
Rs 3.0 billion in the corresponding period last year. Other Items (net) of the banking
system also exerted an expansionary impact of Rs 0.3 billion during July-March 1999-2000,
compared with an expansion of Rs 1.0 billion in the same period last year. Causative
factors of money supply (M2), during July-March 1999-2000 are given in Table 6.1.
Table 6.1
Factors Causing Changes in Monetary Assets
(Rs. billion)
Actual |
|||
| Sector/Factor | Revised Credit Plan Target 1999-2000 |
1999-2000 (Jul-Mar) |
1998-99 (Jul-Mar) |
| A. Domestic Credit (Growth Rate %) i) Government Sector Borrowing - Net Budgetary Support - Commodity Operations - Effect of Zakat Fund ii) Non-Government Sector - Autonomous Bodies - Private Sector including PSCEs a) Private Sector b) PSCEs c) PSEs SP A/C debt repayment iii) Other Items (net) B. Foreign Assets(Net) Total Monetary Expansion(A+B) (Growth Rate %) |
109.0 |
29.3 36.9 |
11.8 |
* Includes Rs 5.0 billion for restructuring of WAPDA
Source: State Bank of Pakistan
Components of Monetary Assets(M2)
The components of monetary assets (M2) are: (i) currency in circulation, (ii) demand
deposits, (iii) time deposits, (iv) other deposits (excluding IMF A/C, counterpart), and
(V) residents' foreign currency deposits.
i) Currency in Circulation:
Currency in circulation being the most liquid form of money supply have direct relation
with price behaviour in an economy. During the 80s, annual average increase in currency in
circulation was 15.5 percent which declined to 10.8 percent during 1990-99. Comparatively
lower economic growth in the 1990s may have a direct link to lower flow of currency in
circulation as compared to the 1980s. In July-March 1999-2000, currency in circulation
increased by 18.9 percent (Rs 54.3 billion), as against 15.3 percent (Rs 41.8 billion) in
the same period last year. As on 31st March 2000, currency in circulation constituted 25.9
percent of money supply, compared to its share of 25.2 percent in the comparable period of
last year (Table 6.2).
Table 6.2
Stock of Components of Monetary Assets(M2)
(Rs billion)
End June |
End March |
|||||
| Items | Average 80s |
Average 90s |
1999 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
| Currency in Circulation Demand Deposits with banks (a) Other Deposits with SBP (b) Time Deposits with banks (a) Residents Foreign Currency Deposits Money Supply(M2) As Percent of M2 Currency in Circulation Demand Deposits Other Deposits Time Deposits RFCD M2/GNP |
66.5 |
210.5 |
287.7 |
314.8 |
342.0 |
|
Source: State Bank of Pakistan
a) Excluding inter-bank deposits, deposits of government and foreign constituents.
b) Excluding IMF A/C No. 1 & 2 and SAF Loan Account, Counterpart Funds and Deposit of
foreign governments, central banks, international organizations and deposits of money
banks.
Note: Figures in parentheses represnt growth.
ii) Demand deposits with scheduled banks
The scheduled bank's demand deposits increased by an annual average of 13.3 percent in the
90s, compared to 13.7 percent in the 1980s. In 1998-99, there was a un-precedented
increase of Rs 148.1 billion in demand deposits. This may be attributed to the huge
withdrawal from the FCA (Rs 158 billion) and converting part of them into demand deposits.
During the first nine months of the current fiscal year, demand deposits grew by 9.4
percent (Rs 32.9 billion) as compared to an increase of 46.9 percent (Rs 94.2 billion) in
the same period last year. The relatively slower growth in demand deposits can be
attributed to base effect (because it is measured from a very large base) and some
deposits flowing into the stock markets. The outstanding stock of demand deposits was Rs
382 billion as on end March 2000, representing 28.9 percent of the M2 stock. On the
corresponding date of last year the demand deposits constituted 23.6 percent of M2.
iii) Time Deposits:
The time deposits of the scheduled banks increased by an annual average rate of 23.4
percent during 1990-99, as compared to 10.9 percent in the 80s. Time deposits showing a
growth of 15.5 percent in 1998-99 declined by 0.4 percent in the first nine months of the
current fiscal year, mainly due to the closing of various lottery schemes. Notwithstanding
the decline in the growth of time deposits, its share in M2 was 39 percent as on March 31,
2000 as against 38.4 percent in the corresponding date of last year.
iv) Residents' Foreign Currency Deposits (RFCD)
This scheme was introduced in February 1991. Within a span of 7 years, i.e; from 1991-92
to 1997-98, it became the most important component of money supply (M2). However, as a
result of freezing of the RFCD in May 1998, a large scale conversion into local currency
had taken place. The conversion continued in 1999-2000. During the first nine months of
the current year, net conversion worth Rs 45 billion from this scheme has taken place as
against Rs 127.6 billion in the first nine months of 1998-99.
While there is no standard method to measure financial deepening, the most widely used
indicator is the ratio of M2 to GNP. This ratio indicates, how monetized is the economy
and how important role its banks are playing in mobilizing deposits. This ratio has
increased significantly over the years - rising from 36.5 percent in the 1980s to 42.4
percent in the first half and 44.3 percent in the second half of the 1990s. Other
indicators of financial deepening such as the ratio of total deposits to M2 and the time
deposits to M2 have all registered an impressive increase after the financial sector
reforms. During the 1980s, the total deposits was 64.5 percent of M2 which increased to
65.7 percent in the first half and 76.3 percent in the second half of the 1990s.
Furthermore, time deposits as percentage of M2 increased from 31.4 percent in the 1980s to
36 percent in the end June 1995 and further to 39.0 percent in the end March 2000. Total
demand and time deposits was 54.7 percent of M2 in 1990-91 which increased to 60.6 percent
in June 1995 and further to 67.9 percent in March 2000. This suggests that the financial
sector reform over the last one decade has led to the financial deepening in the banking
system.
Measures of Money Supply and their Behaviour
The annual trends of M1, M2 and M3 since June, 1991 to June, 1999 and upto March 2000 are
given in Table 6.3 (see under).
During the first nine months of 1999-2000, M1 has increased by 13.4 percent (Rs 86.5
billion), as against an increase of 28.6 percent (Rs 137.6 billion) in the comparable
period last year. On the other hand, M2 has recorded a growth of 3.2 percent during the
period under review, compared to its growth of 3.5 percent last year, while M3 has
increased by 5.9 percent as compared to 10.6 percent in the same period last year. Higher
growth in M3 during 1998-99 and first nine months of the current fiscal year was due to
increase in the net accrual of National Saving schemes. The main components of M3 are;
outstanding stock of M2, outstanding deposits of the national saving schemes (NSS),
outstanding deposits of National Development Finance Corporation (NDFC) and deposits of
Federal Banks for Cooperatives. M3 is dominated primarily by M2 and deposits of the NSS.
Since 1994-95, the share of NSS has been rising and became the main instrument of higher
M3 growth. In June 1995, the shares of M2, NSS, and other two organizations (NDFC and
Co-operative Bank) to M3 were 76.1 percent, 23.6 percent, and 0.3 percent respectively
which have changed to 64.9 percent, 35.0 percent and a negligible 0.1 percent in March
2000, giving more weight to the NSS.
Table 6.3
Stocks of Monetary Aggregates
(Rs billion)
Money Supply & Monetary Assets |
(Percentage Change) |
|||||
| End Period Change Stock (Last Working Day Of) | (M1) |
(M2) |
(M3) |
(M1) |
(M2) |
(M3) |
| June, 1991 June, 1992 June, 1993 June, 1994 June, 1995 June, 1996 June, 1997 June, 1998 June, 1999 March, 1999* March, 2000* |
265.1 |
400.6 |
569.4 |
10.4 |
17.4 |
12.9 |
Source: State Bank of Pakistan & E.A. Wing, Ministry of Finance.
@ As from 23rd February, 1991 the Resident Foreign Currency Deposits are treated as part
of Monetary Assets knocking them off as foreign liability.
* Cover the period of July-March.
Monetary Policy
A number of important steps have been taken during 1999-2000 to improve working of the
money and banking sector and investment environment, including drastic reduction in
lending rates by the leading commercial banks, downward adjustment of repo rate by the SBP
and reduction in the deposit rates on national saving schemes. Various monetary and credit
control measures taken during the current financial year are given in the box. 6.1.
BOX 6.1
Credit Control and other Measures, 1999-2000
i). The State Bank amended its Export Finance Scheme and effective from January 1, 1999
small and medium exporters and indirect exporters were made eligible for financing under
the scheme. Further, the banks were instructed to keep charges for opening of Inland
Letter of Credit (ILCs) at the minimum.
ii). The State Bank reduced Statutory Liquidity Requirements (SLRs) of banks from 15.0
percent to 13.0 percent and Cash Reserve Requirements from 5.0 percent to 3.5 percent on
May 19, 1999. The liquidity ratio maintained by the NBFIs was also reduced from 14.0
percent to 12.0 percent with effect from May 26, 1999 in anticipation of rapid withdrawals
from frozen FCAs following the unification of exchange rate regime. Having achieved the
desired results, it was decided in July, 1999 to revert back to the requirements operative
before May, 1999. Accordingly, effective from 12th July, 1999 the statutory cash reserve
requirement was raised from 3.5 percent of their demand and time liabilities to 5 percent
on weekly average basis subject to a minimum of 4 percent. The statutory liquidity ratio
(SLR) of banks was also raised from 13 percent to 15 percent. The SLR of NBFIs was also
raised from 12 percent to 14 percent.
iii). Banks and financial institutions were allowed to introduce viable new products to
regain some of the outflows in the shape of withdrawals from frozen FCAs. In the process,
some of the banks introduced lottery schemes which attracted criticism from various
quarters. Accordingly, the State Bank decided on 13th July, 1999 to close down these
schemes by 31st December, 1999.
iv) On 13th August, 1999, amendment was made in Export Finance Scheme to give option to
the direct exporter either to establish an Inland Letter of Credit (ILC) in favour of the
Indirect Exporter/Issue a Standardized Purchase Order (SPO) or make payment through
cheques. The Indirect Exporter would, however, be able to have access to the Export
Finance Scheme only if an ILC is established or SPO is issued by the Direct Exporter.
v) Effective from 14th October 1999 all import letters of credit were made subject to a
minimum cash margin of 10 percent for industrial raw material, 20 percent for machinery of
all kinds & their spare parts and 35 percent for all other goods. However, cash margin
requirement was not applicable to essential imports. The minimum margin requirement for
opening letters of credit for industrial raw materials was withdrawn with effect from
October 28, 1999 and for machinery, all kinds and their spare parts w.e.f. 1st November,
1999.
vi). Investment banks including NBFIs were restricted to undertake repo transactions with
scheduled banks against their holding of Government securities since June 26, 1996. It was
decided on November 10, 1999 to withdraw these restrictions, effective from 15th November,
1999.
vii). The State Bank allowed banks and NBFIs with effect from 20th October and 27th
October, 1999 respectively, to provide financing facilities against the shares of listed
companies subject to a minimum margin of 50 percent for banks and 30 percent for NBFIs of
their average market value of the preceding 12 months.
viii). With a view to bringing operational improvements in the money market, it was
decided that with effect from 30th November, 1999 banks/NBFIs would enter into Master Repo
agreement with their counter part before entering into repo transactions.
ix.) Effective from January 5, 2000, the annual rate of return on SBP financing facility
to banks for meeting their temporary liquidity shortages and SBP 3-Day Repo facility
against Government of Pakistan Market Treasury Bills and Federal Investment Bonds was
reduced from 13 percent to 11 percent.
x). Banks and DFIs were directed on February 2, 2000 to strictly observe certain rules
while making any donations/contributions for charitable, social, educational or public
welfare purposes.
xi). Banks were required since September, 1996 to obtain prior clearance in writing from
the State Bank before they grant on financing facility (whether fund-based or non-fund
based) to Modaraba. However, effective from February 15, 2000, the above restriction does
not apply as long as banks extend financing facility to Modarabas with a credit rating of
at least B-3.
xii). On February 23, 2000, the SBP announced new rules for operating the Cash Management
Accounts (CMA) by the investment banks. The investment bank would deploy the funds
accepted in approved activities under these rules, acting as an agent of the customer.
Auction of Government Securities Eversince the introduction of open market operation (OMO)
in 1990-91, the sales and purchases of Government securities have been increasing with the
passage of time. In 1990-91, two instruments namely; Treasury Bills (TBs) and Federal
Investment Bonds (FIBs) were introduced. The amount offered during 1990-91 was Rs 88.5
billion out of which Rs 65.6 billion was accepted.Short-Term Federal Bonds were introduced
in 1996-97.
The Short-Term Federal Bonds (STFBs) with six month maturity were replaced by six month
Government of Pakistan's Market Treasury Bills (MRTBs) w.e.f. 25th June, 1998 and their
first auction was settled on 26th June, 1998. In addition, two more instruments viz
3-months (90 days) and 12 months (365 days), Government of Pakistan Market Treasury Bills
were introduced, and their first auction was held on 13th July, 1998. The annual sales of
government securities is given in Table 6.4.
Table 6.4
Sales of Government Securities
(Rs billion)
July-March |
|||||
96-97 |
97-98 |
98-99 |
98-99 |
99-2000 |
|
| Amount Offered | 188.3 |
533.8 |
774.7 |
614.3 |
381.6 |
| Amount Accepted | 149.5 |
275.8 |
227.6 |
184.8 |
118.2 |
Source: State Bank of Pakistan
During 1998-99, Rs 774.7 billion were offered for sale in the market. Of which, Rs 227.6
billion were accepted representing 29.4 percent of the offered money. Nineteen auctions of
Market Treasury Bills were conducted during July 1999 to March 2000. Announced target for
treasury bills of all maturities combined during this period was Rs 174.7 billion.
Combined amount offered by participants was Rs 381.6 billion out of which Rs 118.2 billion
were accepted. Weighted average yield on six months treasury bills came down from 10.25
percent prevailing in September, 1999 to 7.44 percent in March 2000. Reduction in yield
was made possible by a combination of various actions including: (i) reduction in SBP Repo
Rate from 14.0 percent to 11.0; (ii) frequent injection of funds in money market through
short-term reverse repos under-taken in the open market operations of the SBP; (iii)
acceptance of lower amounts in auctions to keep the money market comfortably liquid; and
(iv) keeping auctions of Federal Investment Bonds (FIBs) suspended so as not to lock-up
surplus funds of money market for long term.
Reforms and Development of Primary Market
Various steps were taken in the first half of 1999-2000 to strengthen the Primary market
of treasury bills. Maturity periods were made more flexible in July, 1999 for three, six
and twelve months market treasury bills by removing the rigidity of exact days. A fixed
schedule of auctions was introduced in September, 1999 to ensure transparency and
regularity for investors.
To increase the future volume of sales in auctions and remove the mismatch between dates
of forthcoming auction settlements and repayment of treasury bills, maturity period has
been specified as 84 days for three months, 182 days for six months and 364 days for
twelve months. Tender Notice for Auctions containing necessary information are also being
put on Reuter's pages besides being published in newspapers. Auction results are now
released on the same day.
Reforms and Development of Secondary Market
Various steps were taken during July 1999 - March 2000 to strengthen and deepen the
secondary market of government securities, specially treasury bills and FIBs. Active
trading was witnessed in the inter-bank market of treasury bills as well as inter-bank
market of FIBs. With the lowering of Treasury Bills yields, trading of FIBs continued to
take place with sizeable premium, which brought down their effective yields to well below
their fixed coupon rates. With the removal of restrictions in November, 1999 on repo
transactions against government securities on NBFIs secondary market also strengthened,
besides opening a channel for NBFIs to obtain funds from inter-bank money market.
The open market operations were conducted judiciously by the State Bank of Pakistan to
keep the flow of monetary aggregates within targets, induce the commercial banks to extend
credit to private sector, and keep the short term interest rates to the desired levels.
Twenty-five open market operations were conducted during July 1999 - March 2000, out of
which seventeen were two-way operations inviting simultaneous quotes for sale as well as
purchases. A total of Rs 63.6 billion was mopped up through outright sales and repos of
various tenors in one-way operations. To keep the money market liquid, specially during
the second quarter i.e. October-December, 1999, a total of Rs 116.8 billion was injected
through reverse repos of one months, two weeks or seven days maturities. Timely injection
of short term funds kept the market comfortably liquid besides allaying the fears of banks
about Y2K problem.
Interest Rate Structure
The advance rates in Pakistan were very high, compared with other regional countries. In
June 1999, weighted average lending rate in Pakistan was 14.8 percent while it was 5.4
percent in Australia, 5.9 percent in China, 12 percent in India and 14 percent in
Bangladesh. The higher lending rates is detrimental to a vibrant and promising private
sector. In Pakistan, higher lending rates was one of the factors behind the emergence of a
mounting debt and default culture, in the 1990s. Huge loan defaults have adversely
affected profitability of the banks and availability of credit to the small but efficient
investors and entrepreneurs. Due to delinquent loans and mis-management, mainly as a
result of higher cost of lending, huge pre-tax losses were incurred by five major domestic
banks, namely; National Bank Ltd., Habib Bank Ltd., United Bank Ltd., Muslim Commercial
Bank Ltd. and Allied Bank Ltd. between 1996 and 1998, as against their pre-tax profit of
about Rs 14.0 billion between 1993 to 1995. Their non-performing advances have increased
by about Rs 30 billion between 1996-98. Downward adjustment of lending rates was
therefore, necessary to improve the performance of the financial sector by removing the
distortion and reviving the investors confidence.
Table 6.5
Lending and Deposit Rates
(Percentage)
Weighted Average Lending Rate |
Weighted average deposit rate |
|||
Nominal |
Real |
Nominal |
Real |
|
| June 1995 June 1996 June 1997 June 1998 June 1999 December 1999 Average |
13.7 |
0.7 |
8.2 |
-4.8 |
Source: State Bank of Pakistan.
A number of steps were taken in the recent past to bring down the lending rates and
increasing the flow of credit to the private sector at lower cost. This was also necessary
due to persistent decline in the inflation rate since 1997-98. The low inflationary
environment has been incorporated into the lending rate structure of commercial banks.
Lending rates have fallen since early 1998-99 but have not matched the fall in inflation
rates due to higher intermediation costs in the NCBs and the privatized banks, which
includes provisioning for non-performing loans (NPLs) and burden of over staffing.
The State Bank of Pakistan lowered its repo rate twice during 1998-99 and 1999-2000. The
repo rate was reduced from 14 percent in May 1999 to 11 percent in January 2000. As a
follow up the five major banks also announced reduction in their lending rates by an
average of 1.5 to 2.0 percentage points first in April, 1999 and again in January, 2000.
Therefore, the monthly weighted average rate of return on advances (overall) declined to
14.4 percent in December, 1999 from 14.8 percent in June, 1999. The weighted average rate
of return of Market Treasury Bills has also come down from 13.0 percent in June 1999 to
9.4 percent in March 2000 and further to 7.6 percent in May 2000.
To judge the effectiveness of the prevailing lending and deposit rates what is important
is to look at the real rate and not the nominal rate. A higher real lending rate may
increase the profitability of the banks and other financial institutions but it may be
detrimental to the investment promotion activities. On the other hand, the higher real
deposit rate should encourage mobilisation of deposits. Between June 1995 to December 2000
the weighted average nominal lending rate averaged 14.6 percent while the weighted average
real lending rate averaged 5.8 percent. It may be noted that the real weighted average
lending rate increased substantially during the last five and a half years - rising from
0.7 percent in June 1995 to 11.0 percent in December 1999. While nominal lending rate
exhibited a rising trend during June 1995 to June 1998 it has declined thereafter; but the
real lending rate on the other hand has registered a sharp increase over the periods,
mainly due to declining inflation rate since 1997-98. The weighted average nominal deposit
rate has remained, more or less, unchnged at around 8.2 percent since June 1995. The
weighted average real deposit rate remained negative until June 1997 and it turned
positive thereafter, mainly due to declining inflation rate.
Performance of Banks
There are 45 banks operating in the country, of which, 25 are domestic while 20 are
foreign banks. Among 25 domestic banks, there are 4 nationalized banks, 2 privatized
banks, 4 specialized banks and 15 private banks.
In 1994-95 total assets/liabilities of domestic and foreign banks were Rs 1647.6 billion,
including Rs 1309.8 billion or 79.5 percent for domestic banks and Rs 337.8 billion or
20.5 percent for foreign banks. By 1998-99 these ratios changed to 84 percent for the
domestic banks and 16 percent for the foreign banks, indicating that both assets and
liabilities of the domestic banks have increased more than that of foreign banks. Between
1994-95 to 1998-99 branches of domestic banks have declined from 8326 to 7973 (a net
decline of 353 branches), while during the same period foreign banks branches have
increased from 74 to 85 (Table 6.6).
Table 6.6
Assets/Liabilities and Branches of Domestic & Foreign Banks
1994-95 |
1996-97 |
1997-98 |
1998-99 |
|
| A.Total Assets (Rs billion) i). Domestic Banks ii). Foreign Banks iii). Total B. Bank Branches (Nos) i.) Domestic Banks ii.) Foreign Banks iii.) Total |
|
|
|
|
Source: State Bank of Pakistan
Total assets of all banks increased by 7.2 percent to Rs 1704.2 billion as of March 31,
2000, compared to Rs 1589.6 billion in the preceding year. Total deposits of all banks
increased by 3.6 percent from Rs 1032.3 billion at the end March, 1999 to Rs 1069.5
billion at end March, 2000. Borrowing remained the major source of funds of specialized
banks, which financed over 72 percent of their total assets as of 31st December, 1999.
Total advances of all banks have increased by 10.4 percent from Rs 674.6 billion as of
March 1999 to Rs 744.6 billion as of March 2000. Total investments by banks registered a
decline of 16.0 percent from Rs 372.3 billion as of March, 1999 to Rs 312.6 billion as of
March 2000 mainly due to decrease in return on Government Securities as well as reduction
in Statutory Liquidity Requirement by the State Bank of Pakistan (Table 6.7).
Table 6.7
Profile of Scheduled Banks
(Rs in billion)
March 31, 1999 |
March 31, 2000 |
|
| Total Assets Total Liabilities Total Deposits (General) Investment Total Advances Domestic Banks* Branches(nos) Foreign Banks* Branches(nos) |
1589.6 |
1704.2 |
*: pertains to end June, 1999.
Source: State Bank of Pakistan
The overall return on advances and investment of banks depicted a decrease from 13.5
percent in 1998 to 12.9 percent in 1999 as a result of the SBP and Government's endeavor
to reduce lending rates of banks so as to encourage invest-ment in the country.
The profitability of banks showed significant improvement during 1999. In absolute terms,
the profit (after tax) increased from Rs 1.5 billion in 1998 to Rs.9.3 billion in 1999.
The major increase in profit was attributed to specialized banks where loss of Rs 6.2
billion (after tax) was converted into profit (after-tax) of Rs 1.4 billion. The overall
average cost of deposits and borrowings decreased from 8.4 percent in 1998 to 7.6 percent
in 1999. The corresponding overall average cost of advances and investments declined from
13.5 percent in 1998 to 12.9 percent in 1999. This resulted in the increase of average
spread to 5.3 percent in 1999 from 5.1 percent in 1998.
The NCBs and privatized banks continued to close their loss making branches keeping in
view the requirement of reducing unnecessary expenditure and loss to the banking
institutions. The banks have so far closed 788 branches/booths under the branch
rationalization programme including 103 branches/booths closed during the year ended 1999.
The request of private commercial banks for opening of new branches are, however,
considered in the light of the parameters laid down in the branch licensing policy in
force. These bank's opened seven branches and closed four branches during 1999. A foreign
bank namely Trust Bank Limited has been merged with Metropolitan Bank Limited through an
Amalgamation Order issued in February 2000. At present there are 7961 branches of
scheduled banks functioning in the country.
Privatization
The role of State Bank of Pakistan in privatization of financial institutions is of
advisory capacity. However, so far Bankers Equity Limited (BEL), Habib Credit and Exchange
Bank (Bank Al Falah), Muslim Commercial Bank Limited (MCB), and Allied bank Limited (ABL)
have been privatized while process has been initiated for early privatization of other
NCBs and Public Sector Development Finance Institutions (DFIs). The First Women Bank
Limited (FWBL) has also been privatized but its sale was subject to conditionalities laid
down vide an interim order passed by the Lahore High Court in writ petition filed by Women
Action Forum. The said writ petition is still pending adjudication in the Lahore High
Court.
Non-Performing Loans and Recovery
The non-performing loans (NPL) are defined as loans overdue by at least 90 days. No
interest/mark up is accrued on non-performing loans. Total NPL of all commercial banks
amounted to Rs 173.4 billion as on 31st December, 1999, compared to Rs 151.8 billion in
December, 1998 indicating an increase of 14.2 percent during the year. The share of
nationalized/privatized banks in total NPL of the banking industry was 59.4 percent as on
December 31, 1999 compared to 74.6 percent as on December 31, 1998, while their share in
total advances of banking industry was 56.0 percent and 58.2 percent, respectively. The
HBL was the major victim as its NPL amounted to Rs 42.1 billion as on 31st December, 1999
constituting 24.3 percent of total NPL of the banking industry. The NPL of private banks
grew at a rapid rate of 99.8 percent to Rs 14.1 billion followed by specialized banks at
99.6 percent to Rs 48.1 billion.
Cash recovery to NPL of the banking industry improved from 11.1 percent in 1998 to 16.5
percent in 1999. Out of total loan defaults of all commercial banks amounting to Rs 185.2
billion as of 12th October, 1999, total cash recovery upto 15th March, 2000 amounted to Rs
12.0 billion.
Small Loan Scheme
To arrange equitable distribution of bank credit among various sectors of the economy with
particular regard to the needs of the sectors neglected in the past, a Small Loans Scheme
was prepared. The scheme came into force from December, 1972. Initially arrangements were
made that the National Credit Consultative Council will fix specific targets for the small
loan to be achieved by the banking sector. However, this system was discontinued in June,
1995 and now banks are free to extend credit in this sector according to their own lending
policies. Under the Scheme two type of loans are provided. Loans and advances, including
bills purchased and discounted given by any bank for business purposes, not exceeding Rs
300,000/- per borrower, including those to dependent member of his family would be treated
as "Small Loan". Loans and advances given to industrial units, including cottage
industries, which have fixed assets (excluding land and buildings), the original value of
which did not exceed Rs 20 million would be treated as "Small Loan".
The losses incurred by the banks on account of loans and advances, including bills
purchased and discounted under the said scheme carry guarantee from SBP and 50 percent of
any bonafide loss (principal amount only) which a bank has proved to the satisfaction of
SBP, to have incurred in any transaction of loans and advances, are reimbursed to the
banks.
Total disbursement and outstanding posi-tion of loans provided under this scheme as on
December 1999 was Rs 4.5 billion and Rs 15.0 billion respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home | About Us | Contact | Information Resources |