Welcome to PakSearch.com Pakistan's Premier Business Information
Service


For business information, annual reports, laws, ordinances, regulations and articles.






Google
 
Web Paksearch.com

Search of solution

a) Revenues by yields
Cost of sugar production is precisely an outcome of sugarcane support price, vis-a-vis recovery benchmark, latter kept constant since the support price mechanism came into operation. Increase in support price and premium for higher recovery was administered often, at times to the extent of creating distortion. This provided security to the sugarcane growers about their revenues to be always cost plus. Pursuits in cultivating high yield and sucrose varieties of sugarcane fell victim of complacency and got virtually overlooked by assured revenues and return. This is borne by the average national yields at about 47 tons per hectare and average national recovery of about 8.33% for the review year.

Sugar industry wants that the sugarcane growers are adequately rewarded of their sugarcane harvest. Their revenues and earning provided linked with yields and sucrose instead of the single outdated mechanism of support price, could bring the desired results. It is a reality that sugarcane support price in Pakistan is one of the highest, while sugarcane yields and sucrose are one of the lowest! This is the reason of sugar business becoming sour for the industry and in taste to the consumers. Removal of unrealistic safeguards and their replacement by sound realistic methods would make sugar sweet for all the stakeholders.

b) Quality premium
The mechanism of Quality Premium has thrust variations in cost of sugar production within the sugar industry. Sugar recovery benchmark of 8.7% bears no relevance anymore. On the contrary, it is dragging the growers with support price crutches to low recovery infusing complacency about improvement in the crop quality. Increased sugarcane price can be rectified by increasing the recovery benchmark to 10%, if mechanism of irrational quality premium is to persist in isolation. Short recovery than benchmark shall attract proportionate discount in price.

c) Gains by growth
Sugarcane growers' monetary gain needs be linked with sugarcane yield. It is their domain to excel which serve national interests. It is a fact that yields and recoveries in Pakistan have been the lowest despite tremendous scope for achieving dramatic growth in them. Exploiting the scope will be a correct, legitimate and rational approach of gains by the growers. Relevant mechanism needs to be set in place and timely to gear it up.

National sugarcane yield for the past one decade has been in the range of 37 to 47 tons per hectare with exception of 50 for 1997-98. This has been a bane, being the lowest among the main sugarcane cultivating countries. According to the research men, yields range can be raised from 72 to 90 tons per hectare by installing supervised sugarcane cultivation. It can be raised further to 100/120 tons per hectare by inducting varietal research and development, which remains wholly neglected.

Likewise, sugar recovery can be improved from the low level of 8.7% to 10/12% by sucrose enrichment in sugarcane. On achieving these targets, with the given acreage of 1000 thousand hectares under the sugarcane crop, sugarcane and sugar production can be substantially increased, as illustrated in the following.

Potentials of 1000 thousand hectares under sugarcane crop.

Yield

Sugarcane

Sugarcane utilisation

Recovery

Sugar

 

crop

percent

volume

%

production

T/H

M/T

 

M/T

 

M/T

50

50

67

34

9.00

3.06

55

55

69

38

9.30

3.53

60

60

71

43

9.50

4.08

65

65

73

47

9.70

4.55

70

70

76

52

9.90

5.14

75

75

77

58

10.10

5.85

80

80

79

63

10.30

6.48

85

85

81

69

10.50

7.24

90

90

83

75

10.70

8.02

Note: T/H stands for tons per hectare.
M/T stands for million tons.

Sound plan for sugarcane production, with supervised and managed cultivation culture is eagerly awaited. For this objective to attain, a three year plan be designed to achieve reasonably increased sugarcane yields. This pursuit shall prove really rewarding and no crutches of support price structure, in vogue for the past many years at a stretch, would be needed. The current malady of high cost of sugar production created by the existing structure can also be addressed by executing this strategy.

Malady

The PSMA have always pointed out the system in vogue as a fallacy in assessing cost of sugarcane production and deciding increase in support price of sugarcane out of proportion. This malady has carried adverse influence on the cost of sugar production. After setting the sugar marketing to free price system during 1984, the system of deciding sugarcane price alone has become out of tune.

Without concern about the cost of production and cost of sales of sugar and price that must give a surplus on equity, atleast equal to economic rate of return, the successive governments have identically shown a tendency of anxiety about sugar prices. Sugar needs not be seen in isolation. Sugar has direct link with sugarcane cost/price and with general price trend in the economy.

The PSMA continues to plead for considering the case of cost-price disequilibrium dispassionately so as to set an equitable mechanism in place to allow sugar industry play its role in the national economy. Alternatively, suitable mechanism be arranged for sugar price find its level for survival of the sugar industry.

Sugar industry is plagued by several problems and they are piling up. Removal of identified and agreed upon hardships remains awaiting for regularisation and rectification. As a result, problems keep on compounding and this implies financial stress. It is still to be realised in the officialdom. For an instance, the number of taxes and its cumulative burden placed on sugar, a food item and a vital ingredient of several other food items and consumer products. Some other major problems are discussed briefly below so as to place them in sharp focus.

a) Market committee fee
Levy of fees by the market committees on sugar mills bears no justification. It implies an extortion. It is persisting despite a number of representations made by the PSMA-SZ against its rationale. The government attitude about it has been positive, in line with PSMA's rationale. Yet no amendment is carried to exempt the sugar industry from this stress. Fee and tax bear different connotations. Fee is chargeable for specific service/s. MCs have no role, whatsoever, in marketing of sugarcane being supplied to sugar industry. Sugarcane supply and prices are supervised by Cane Commissioner under a separate statute, being Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950. Sugarcane prices are announced by the provincial government under advice by the federal government. Recovery of market committee fee has no reason. It is, as such, coercive in effect. Two sets of acts for a single product and purpose, besides charging fees without services, continues to erode resources of the sugar industry. This bad patch is persisting as usual. Sindh provincial government's directives to dismantle deep rooted corrupt practices and consequent malaise, need to take care of this ghost roaming around, eating up sugar industry's vitals.

b) Sugarcane/Road cess
Road cess is being recovered since 1964 for the two specific purposes, (a) construction/reconstruction, repairs and maintenance of roads network linking sugarcane farms with sugar factories and (b) undertaking varietal research and development for sugarcane. The cess fund rate in Sindh has been increasing over the years. The accounts of the fund's "utilisation" have not been seen, due perhaps to its being quite questionable. Ignoring this, increase in the rate was notified on February 19, 1995 and Act for it was passed during March 1995.

Rates of Sugarcane/Road Cess

Season/ Year

Rate per 40 kg. of sugarcane (Paisa)

Increase%

Basis of Contribution by

     

Growers (Paisa/%)

Sugar Mills (Paisa/%)

1964-73

12

--

6/50%

6/50%

1974-89

18

509/50%

9/50%

 
1990-94

28

55

14/50%

14/50%

1995-2000

100

257

25/25%

75/75%

Actual

50

78.6

25/50%

25/50%

A phenomenal escalation in the rate has certainly been burdensome, inequitable, untimely, besides bearing no reason for enhancement. It is laudable that the then Chief Minister, Chief Secretary, Secretary Agriculture, Secretary Industries and other officials of Sindh government appreciated the problem, its nature and its bidding for odds. They have directed for implementing the agreement hammered out on June 20, 1996 by the PSMA-SZ with Advisor Finance to the then Chief Minister. It needs to be implemented.

The PSMA appreciates formation of millswise committees to take care of roads building/rebuilding in a bid to ensure effective utilisation of the cess fund. We hope, this step will create efficient roads network connecting farms with factories.

The PSMA, however, holds a considered view of (a) giving moratorium for a couple of years on cess levy and in this period (b) to arrange and present yearwise accounts of its collection and utilisation, (c) to remobilise the cess fund already collected and earmarked for its appropriate utilisation, (d) to create institutional structure for undertaking R&D on sugarcane with the unutilised funds in the accounts. This matter deserves prompt regularisation as agreed to. Its remaining open will bring financial stress on the sugar mills under the Income Tax Act provisions.

c) Local taxes
The government of Pakistan deserves commendation for the courage of doing away with the obstructive nature of multiple forms, rates and levels of local taxes which, by and large, were going elsewhere and not in the exchequer. It was just creating excess burdens on business and promoting corruptive practices all at the cost of the consumers. It is hoped that this evil chapter will never be reopened as its distaste to all has been well known.

d) Sales tax on bagasse
Assurances to the PSMA given on all government levels and at all times by recognizing inadvertence in demanding sales tax on bagasse used in-house as fuel in generating power during 1996-97 but did not end on to a positive note. Some sugar mills, preferred to file suits as a precautionary remedy, did not pursue it as vigorously as was otherwise desirable. It was by way of putting confidence in assurances for administrative remedy. The entire industry had to suffer enormously on this count. It has shaken confidence in the consultative process to be a remedy, particularly where the revenues were involved. This matter is being pursued by the sugar mills in the Supreme Court. Except such sales tax demand for 1996-97, bagasse used in-house as fuel, substitute of otherwise costly imported fuel, has always been, before and later, exempt from sales tax on valid reasons for it. Same treatment be provided for 1996-97, to make it equitable.


Google
 
Web Paksearch.com




Home | About Us | Contact | Information Resources