| |
|
|
|
| For business information, annual reports, laws, ordinances, regulations and articles. |
|
|
|
Search of solution
a) Revenues by yields
Cost of sugar production is precisely an outcome of sugarcane support price, vis-a-vis
recovery benchmark, latter kept constant since the support price mechanism came into
operation. Increase in support price and premium for higher recovery was administered
often, at times to the extent of creating distortion. This provided security to the
sugarcane growers about their revenues to be always cost plus. Pursuits in cultivating
high yield and sucrose varieties of sugarcane fell victim of complacency and got virtually
overlooked by assured revenues and return. This is borne by the average national yields at
about 47 tons per hectare and average national recovery of about 8.33% for the review
year.
Sugar industry wants that the sugarcane growers are adequately rewarded of their sugarcane
harvest. Their revenues and earning provided linked with yields and sucrose instead of the
single outdated mechanism of support price, could bring the desired results. It is a
reality that sugarcane support price in Pakistan is one of the highest, while sugarcane
yields and sucrose are one of the lowest! This is the reason of sugar business becoming
sour for the industry and in taste to the consumers. Removal of unrealistic safeguards and
their replacement by sound realistic methods would make sugar sweet for all the
stakeholders.
b) Quality premium
The mechanism of Quality Premium has thrust variations in cost of sugar production within
the sugar industry. Sugar recovery benchmark of 8.7% bears no relevance anymore. On the
contrary, it is dragging the growers with support price crutches to low recovery infusing
complacency about improvement in the crop quality. Increased sugarcane price can be
rectified by increasing the recovery benchmark to 10%, if mechanism of irrational quality
premium is to persist in isolation. Short recovery than benchmark shall attract
proportionate discount in price.
c) Gains by growth
Sugarcane growers' monetary gain needs be linked with sugarcane yield. It is their domain
to excel which serve national interests. It is a fact that yields and recoveries in
Pakistan have been the lowest despite tremendous scope for achieving dramatic growth in
them. Exploiting the scope will be a correct, legitimate and rational approach of gains by
the growers. Relevant mechanism needs to be set in place and timely to gear it up.
National sugarcane yield for the past one decade has been in the range of 37 to 47 tons
per hectare with exception of 50 for 1997-98. This has been a bane, being the lowest among
the main sugarcane cultivating countries. According to the research men, yields range can
be raised from 72 to 90 tons per hectare by installing supervised sugarcane cultivation.
It can be raised further to 100/120 tons per hectare by inducting varietal research and
development, which remains wholly neglected.
Likewise, sugar recovery can be improved from the low level of 8.7% to 10/12% by sucrose
enrichment in sugarcane. On achieving these targets, with the given acreage of 1000
thousand hectares under the sugarcane crop, sugarcane and sugar production can be
substantially increased, as illustrated in the following.
Potentials of 1000 thousand hectares under sugarcane crop.
Yield |
Sugarcane |
Sugarcane utilisation |
Recovery |
Sugar |
|
crop |
percent |
volume |
% |
production |
|
T/H |
M/T |
M/T |
M/T |
||
50 |
50 |
67 |
34 |
9.00 |
3.06 |
55 |
55 |
69 |
38 |
9.30 |
3.53 |
60 |
60 |
71 |
43 |
9.50 |
4.08 |
65 |
65 |
73 |
47 |
9.70 |
4.55 |
70 |
70 |
76 |
52 |
9.90 |
5.14 |
75 |
75 |
77 |
58 |
10.10 |
5.85 |
80 |
80 |
79 |
63 |
10.30 |
6.48 |
85 |
85 |
81 |
69 |
10.50 |
7.24 |
90 |
90 |
83 |
75 |
10.70 |
8.02 |
Note: T/H stands for tons per hectare.
M/T stands for million tons.
Sound plan for sugarcane production, with supervised and managed cultivation culture is
eagerly awaited. For this objective to attain, a three year plan be designed to achieve
reasonably increased sugarcane yields. This pursuit shall prove really rewarding and no
crutches of support price structure, in vogue for the past many years at a stretch, would
be needed. The current malady of high cost of sugar production created by the existing
structure can also be addressed by executing this strategy.
Malady
The PSMA have always pointed out the system in vogue as a fallacy in assessing cost of
sugarcane production and deciding increase in support price of sugarcane out of
proportion. This malady has carried adverse influence on the cost of sugar production.
After setting the sugar marketing to free price system during 1984, the system of deciding
sugarcane price alone has become out of tune.
Without concern about the cost of production and cost of sales of sugar and price that
must give a surplus on equity, atleast equal to economic rate of return, the successive
governments have identically shown a tendency of anxiety about sugar prices. Sugar needs
not be seen in isolation. Sugar has direct link with sugarcane cost/price and with general
price trend in the economy.
The PSMA continues to plead for considering the case of cost-price disequilibrium
dispassionately so as to set an equitable mechanism in place to allow sugar industry play
its role in the national economy. Alternatively, suitable mechanism be arranged for sugar
price find its level for survival of the sugar industry.
Sugar industry is plagued by several problems and they are piling up. Removal of
identified and agreed upon hardships remains awaiting for regularisation and
rectification. As a result, problems keep on compounding and this implies financial
stress. It is still to be realised in the officialdom. For an instance, the number of
taxes and its cumulative burden placed on sugar, a food item and a vital ingredient of
several other food items and consumer products. Some other major problems are discussed
briefly below so as to place them in sharp focus.
a) Market committee fee
Levy of fees by the market committees on sugar mills bears no justification. It implies an
extortion. It is persisting despite a number of representations made by the PSMA-SZ
against its rationale. The government attitude about it has been positive, in line with
PSMA's rationale. Yet no amendment is carried to exempt the sugar industry from this
stress. Fee and tax bear different connotations. Fee is chargeable for specific service/s.
MCs have no role, whatsoever, in marketing of sugarcane being supplied to sugar industry.
Sugarcane supply and prices are supervised by Cane Commissioner under a separate statute,
being Sugar Factories Control Act, 1950. Sugarcane prices are announced by the provincial
government under advice by the federal government. Recovery of market committee fee has no
reason. It is, as such, coercive in effect. Two sets of acts for a single product and
purpose, besides charging fees without services, continues to erode resources of the sugar
industry. This bad patch is persisting as usual. Sindh provincial government's directives
to dismantle deep rooted corrupt practices and consequent malaise, need to take care of
this ghost roaming around, eating up sugar industry's vitals.
b) Sugarcane/Road cess
Road cess is being recovered since 1964 for the two specific purposes, (a)
construction/reconstruction, repairs and maintenance of roads network linking sugarcane
farms with sugar factories and (b) undertaking varietal research and development for
sugarcane. The cess fund rate in Sindh has been increasing over the years. The accounts of
the fund's "utilisation" have not been seen, due perhaps to its being quite
questionable. Ignoring this, increase in the rate was notified on February 19, 1995 and
Act for it was passed during March 1995.
Rates of Sugarcane/Road Cess
Season/ Year |
Rate per 40 kg. of sugarcane (Paisa) |
Increase% |
Basis of Contribution by |
|
Growers (Paisa/%) |
Sugar Mills (Paisa/%) |
|||
| 1964-73 | 12 |
-- |
6/50% |
6/50% |
| 1974-89 | 18 |
509/50% |
9/50% |
|
| 1990-94 | 28 |
55 |
14/50% |
14/50% |
| 1995-2000 | 100 |
257 |
25/25% |
75/75% |
| Actual | 50 |
78.6 |
25/50% |
25/50% |
A phenomenal escalation in the rate has certainly been burdensome, inequitable,
untimely, besides bearing no reason for enhancement. It is laudable that the then Chief
Minister, Chief Secretary, Secretary Agriculture, Secretary Industries and other officials
of Sindh government appreciated the problem, its nature and its bidding for odds. They
have directed for implementing the agreement hammered out on June 20, 1996 by the PSMA-SZ
with Advisor Finance to the then Chief Minister. It needs to be implemented.
The PSMA appreciates formation of millswise committees to take care of roads
building/rebuilding in a bid to ensure effective utilisation of the cess fund. We hope,
this step will create efficient roads network connecting farms with factories.
The PSMA, however, holds a considered view of (a) giving moratorium for a couple of years
on cess levy and in this period (b) to arrange and present yearwise accounts of its
collection and utilisation, (c) to remobilise the cess fund already collected and
earmarked for its appropriate utilisation, (d) to create institutional structure for
undertaking R&D on sugarcane with the unutilised funds in the accounts. This matter
deserves prompt regularisation as agreed to. Its remaining open will bring financial
stress on the sugar mills under the Income Tax Act provisions.
c) Local taxes
The government of Pakistan deserves commendation for the courage of doing away with
the obstructive nature of multiple forms, rates and levels of local taxes which, by and
large, were going elsewhere and not in the exchequer. It was just creating excess burdens
on business and promoting corruptive practices all at the cost of the consumers. It is
hoped that this evil chapter will never be reopened as its distaste to all has been well
known.
d) Sales tax on bagasse
Assurances to the PSMA given on all government levels and at all times by recognizing
inadvertence in demanding sales tax on bagasse used in-house as fuel in generating power
during 1996-97 but did not end on to a positive note. Some sugar mills, preferred to file
suits as a precautionary remedy, did not pursue it as vigorously as was otherwise
desirable. It was by way of putting confidence in assurances for administrative remedy.
The entire industry had to suffer enormously on this count. It has shaken confidence in
the consultative process to be a remedy, particularly where the revenues were involved.
This matter is being pursued by the sugar mills in the Supreme Court. Except such sales
tax demand for 1996-97, bagasse used in-house as fuel, substitute of otherwise costly
imported fuel, has always been, before and later, exempt from sales tax on valid reasons
for it. Same treatment be provided for 1996-97, to make it equitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home | About Us | Contact | Information Resources |