| |
|
|
|
| For business information, annual reports, laws, ordinances, regulations and articles. |
|
|
|
Securities Market Division
The regulation of the securities
market is the core function of the Commission. The Securities Market Division (SMD)
monitors and regulates the securities market through powers vested in the Commission under
the Securities and Exchange Ordinance of 1969 and the rules framed thereunder, as well as
under The Act. The SMD regulates both the primary and secondary markets including market
intermediaries. It also acts as an off-site regulator of the stock exchanges, which
includes monitoring their working, particularly with regard to obligations of brokers
towards investors, and ensuring smooth functioning of the clearing house and settlement
operations. In addition, the Division is entrusted with the task of making appropriate
regulatory reforms and proposing measures to deepen the market, restore investor
confidence and ensure transparency in stock market operations.
2.1 Overview
The past year witnessed major developments in the capital market as a consequence
of various reforms initiated by the Commission to promote investor confidence and
strengthen the integrity of the capital market. The measures undertaken by the Commission
were aimed at increasing the demand for and supply of capital that would provide the
necessary fillip to promote further investments, expand industrial output and generate
employment opportunities.
The stock market crisis of May 2000 revealed structural weaknesses in the system that
necessitated implementation of immediate corrective measures by the Commission. The move
towards implementation of the T+3 settlement system, substantial increase in net capital
requirements, stipulation of capital adequacy requirements for brokers and strengthening
of margin requirements were measures aimed at improving risk management at the stock
exchanges and addressing issues identified during the May 2000 crisis at the exchanges.
The appointment of 40 percent independent directors on the Boards of the stock exchanges
and action initiated to ensure independence of the CEO of each exchange, are all measures
introduced in line with international best practices and will go a long way in ensuring an
efficient and transparent capital market in Pakistan
Further, the Commission implemented various regulatory reforms during the course of the
year that included the issuance of the Brokers and Agents Registration Rules and the
Insider Trading Guidelines. All these reforms have been carried out with a view to protect
the rights of small investors and restore confidence in the market.
Institutional investment has been another area of focus recently. A major initiative is
underway to develop the mutual funds/pension funds industry to give the market
institutional underpinning. Also, regulations have been made more flexible to allow
flotation of sector-specific funds to cater to different investor preferences and
investment guidelines have been made less restrictive. All this provides wider avenues for
investment by these funds.
2.2 Stock Market Review (July 2000 - June 2001)
The stock market was in a bear trap during most of the year under review. Between
July and October 2000 the KSE-100 index moved up gradually from 1,520 to a high of 1,605
on October 4, 2000. The marginal improvement in the market was mainly attributable to the
successful negotiations/settlement of the Hubco-WAPDA issue and a favorable response from
the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
From October 5, 2000, the market slid downwards to reach 1,276 in November 2000, thus
recording a fall of 329 points (21 percent). The sharp decline during October-November
2000 was on account of the huge accumulation of positions by some major market
participants in shares of Pakistan State Oil (PSO) that were rapidly disposed of when the
upward momentum in the market could not be sustained. The bearish tempo deepened further
due to dividend announcements by PSO and Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation Limited
(PTCL) that were much below market expectations. There was panic in the market and the
speculators took advantage of the situation by selling "in blank". As a result,
the market moved to the verge of collapse. It was only through the intervention of the
Commission that a recurrence of a crisis similar to the one in May 2000 was prevented. The
Commission, in November 2000, decided that blank sellers would be required to tender
actual delivery of shares by borrowing stock. This regulatory action served to bring some
stability in the market and the index gradually moved up to the level of 1,508 by the end
of December 2000, remaining above the 1,500 level till January 11, 2001. From January 12,
2001 onward, the market remained bearish, gradually slipping from the 1,500 level to 1,366
on June 29, 2001.
Overall, the KSE-100 index dropped by 10 percent during the period July 2000 to June 2001
- from 1,520 on July 3, 2000 to 1,366 on June 29, 2001. The bearish trend in the market
could be attributed to several factors such as depreciation of the Pak rupee against the
US dollar, continued selling by foreign investors (mainly Morgan Stanley Pakistan Fund and
Templeton), the Prudential Group crisis, fear of National Accountability Bureau/Federal
Investigation Agency investigations into the affairs of a few brokerage houses and the
lack of support from institutional investors. The pressure on the market from these
factors was compounded by the fact that all market participants (whether jobbers,
speculators or institutions) were holding positions dependent on short term financing and
had no substantive capacity to absorb the foreign selling. It was largely due to these
reasons that the market failed to respond to a range of incentives conducive to stock
market development announced in the June 2000 budget.
2.3 Stock Exchange Wing
2.3.1 Reforms in the Stock Market
The May 2000 crisis highlighted fundamental weaknesses in the stock exchanges,
including poor governance, weak risk management as well as lack of market integrity and
transparency. The Commission accordingly took a number of important steps in line with a
comprehensive reform program to restore investor confidence and to achieve a fair,
transparent and efficient stock market. In order to achieve these objectives, the Stock
Exchange Wing of the SMD implemented the following measures:?
i) Improvements in Governance
The following measures have been implemented:
1. The Commission is to nominate 40 percent independent directors on the Board of each
stock exchange after due consultation. In 2001, seven non-broker directors were nominated
on the Boards of the Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) and the Lahore Stock Exchange (LSE) and
five directors on the Board of the Islamabad Stock Exchange (ISE).
2. Independent, professional management has been ensured on the exchanges by requiring the
Managing Director/CEO of each stock exchange to be appointed and removed with the approval
of the Commission. Independent CEOs have already been appointed at the KSE and the LSE
with prior approval of the Commission.
3. The directors of each exchange have been directed not to delegate operational powers to
any person other than the Managing Director.
4. The number of broker-directors in the Central Depository Company (CDC) has been reduced
from five to three (out of a total of nine).
5. The Chairman of the CDC is to be a non-broker.
6. The Board of Directors of the CDC are required not to delegate operational authority to
anyone except the CEO.
7. The Commission has nominated a director on the Board of the CDC.
1. Risk Management Measures
The following actions were taken and necessary directives issued:
1. The requirement for net capital balance to be maintained by a stock broker has been
enhanced by 10 times to Rs. 2.5 million for KSE brokers, Rs. 1.5 million for LSE brokers
and Rs. 0.75 million for ISE brokers.
2. A measure of capital adequacy for stock brokers has been stipulated. The exposure of a
broker must not exceed 25 times the net capital employed.
3. Margin requirements have been strengthened; notably the brokers' ability to trade up to
Rs. 50 million without margin was abolished and all exposure of brokers is now subject to
margin.
4. The undisclosed market system whereby the identities of the buyers and sellers are not
revealed, in accordance with international practice, has been introduced. This has helped
check manipulation and front running to a certain extent.
5. The internationally accepted T+3 settlement system has been introduced and successfully
implemented at the three stock exchanges.
6. Blank selling has been prohibited.
2.3.2 Regulatory Actions
In order to strengthen the regulatory framework of the capital market and to
facilitate the implementation of the Commission's reform agenda, a number of rules and
regulations were issued which included:
1. Members, Agents and Traders (Eligibility Standards) Rules, 2001 - to prescribe minimum
standards for market intermediaries.
2. Stock Exchange Members (Inspection of Books and Record) Rules, 2001 - to enhance
monitoring of brokers and agents and strengthen the Commission's surveillance
capabilities.
3. Public Companies (Employees Stock Option Scheme) Rules, 2001 - to motivate and
facilitate employees in acquiring a stake in their company's share capital.
4. Insider Trading Guidelines, 2001 - to protect small investors from the use of
privileged information by insiders.
5. Amendments in the Securities and Exchange Rules, 1971 (Net Capital Balance Requirement)
- to define "net capital" in line with internationally accepted practice and
ensure adequate risk management at the exchanges.
6. Share Transfer Agents, Underwriters, Balloters and Consultants to the Issue Rules, 2001
- to specify and streamline the eligibility criteria for share transfer agents,
underwriters, balloters and consultants to the issue.
7. The Companies Share Capital (Variation in Rights and Privileges) Rules, 2000 - to
specify rules for issue of different classes of shares.
8. Brokers Agents Registration Rules - to establish a direct regulatory nexus with brokers
and agents to ensure investor protection.
In addition, the Listed Companies (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeover)
Ordinance, 2000 has been approved by the Cabinet in principle. Once finalized and
promulgated, this would facilitate take over bids and protect the rights of minority
shareholders.
2.3.3 Developments in the Market
1. Establishment of Futures Contracts Market
A market in futures contracts has been introduced in July 2001. A beginning was made by
granting approval to the KSE to commence trading in standard futures contracts in certain
shares. The emergence of a market in futures contracts would not only deepen the capital
market in Pakistan but also provide investors with basic hedging instruments and
investment alternatives.
2. National Clearing and Settlement System
Another development during the year has been the incorporation of the National
Clearing Company of Pakistan Limited. The company was incorporated on July 3, 2001. The
software of the National Clearing and Settlement System (NCSS) is ready and is being
tested. The regulations of NCSS have been finalized and the company is expected to start
operations shortly.
2.4 Market Monitoring and Surveillance
Since its establishment in October 2000, the Market Monitoring and Surveillance
Wing (MMS) has filled an important regulatory gap in the SMD. The mandate of MMS is to
closely track and monitor the market with a view to identifying possible instances of
market manipulation and abuse for further investigation and necessary action.
Consisting of a team of six executives, headed by a Joint Director, MMS is entrusted with
the responsibility of monitoring different sectors of the market on a real-time basis as
well as monitoring developments in these sectors outside the ambit of the market itself.
MMS takes note of unusual or abnormal price or volume movements and other
developments/variations in market behavior which indicate that an abuse of the market may
have occurred.
At present, MMS relies on its constant, real time, watch-and-observe activity as well as
such intelligence as it is able to gather from formal and informal sources. This will soon
be supplemented by an analysis of real-time trading data through a software program linked
to automated trading systems of the stocks exchanges (via a server), which is being
designed to evaluate trading data against specified benchmarks. The system would
automatically generate "alerts" when any unusual activity or price movement is
detected and would obviate the possibility of omitting any action that might have remained
otherwise unnoticed.
MMS is the Commission's "eyes and ears" focused on the stock market. It is, in
particular, expected to look out for suspected instances of insider trading and market
manipulation such as dissemination of false information, cornering and abuse of the
trading process to give a fake or misleading appearance in relation to the price of a
security and/or its activity.
MMS's activities also include the preparation of intra-day, daily and monthly internal
reports; company and sector specific research; analyzing trading data; and collating data
for its information database. Further, since its inception, the Wing has been involved in
a number of special assignments. Its analysis of trading data led to the Commission's
Restraining Order on Blank Selling in November 2000. It has also been deeply involved in
analyzing trading data of various brokers involved in the May 2000 crisis.
In connection with MMS, it is noteworthy that the Commission is endeavoring to get each
stock exchange, as a frontline regulator, to significantly strengthen its monitoring
capacity. MMS would then be essentially supplementing the surveillance carried out by the
stock exchanges and in close coordination with them. With this system in place, it would
be possible for the securities markets to operate in a fair, efficient and transparent
manner.
2.5 Investor Complaints
Quick redressal of investor complaints and grievances is an important instrument
in restoring investor confidence, thus an Investor Complaints Wing has been set up in the
SMD. The complaints are either handled directly by the Commission itself or, if deemed
appropriate, passed on to the concerned stock exchange with the Commission taking steps to
ensure that these receive proper attention. Following is a statistical overview of this
Wing's activities, albeit the data does not capture qualitative improvements in the
disposal of complaints which has helped in preventing further abuses in the market.
Table 1 - Investor Complaint Statistics
| KSE | LSE | ISE | Total | |
| Complaints received during the period 1997 to June 2000 | 29 | 41 | 53 | 123 |
| Complaints resolved during the period 1997 to June 2000 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| Complaints received during the period 1997 to June 2000 but resolved during the period July 2000 to June 2001 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 11 |
| Complaints received from July 2000 to June, 2001 | 47 | 44 | 44 | 135 |
| Complaints resolved from July 2000 to June, 2001 | 12 | 4 | 17 | 33 |
| Complaints against Defaulted Members/ Under Litigation | 7 | 12 | 22 | 41 |
| Pending with stock exchanges | 19 | 20 | 5 | 44 |
| Under Examination with the Commission | 9 | 8 | --- | 17 |
It is clear from the above that
the Commission's vigilance and vigor has resulted in a significantly higher rate of
complaints' disposal. There is an increasing confidence in the investor community that
their genuine complaints will be addressed in a fair and effective manner. The Investor
Complaints Wing is a pillar for investor protection, which the Commission plans to
strengthen appropriately in due course.
2.6 Beneficial Ownership
In order to protect the interests of small shareholders and to discourage
managements of companies from making windfall gains on the basis of privileged inside
information, each director, chief executive, management agent, etc. and holder of more
than 10 percent share capital of a company is required to file certain prescribed returns
of beneficial ownership. Also, any gain made by a beneficial owner of more than 10 percent
equity capital through transactions completed within six months must be reported to the
company and the regulators, and tendered as stipulated by law. During the period under
review, the Commission was able to finalize cases of tenderable gains aggregating Rs. 2.1
million.
During the period under review, a proposal to amend the relevant rules, in order to
exclude the acquisition of right shares from the determination of tenderable gains, was
finalized and sent to the Government for necessary clearance and notification.
2.7 Issue Of Capital
The prospectus of any public offer of securities is required to be approved by
the Commission prior to its issue, circulation and publication. Due to a variety of
reasons (including political uncertainty, rupee devaluation, lack of foreign portfolio
investment, etc.), there were only two public equity offerings during the year under
review. However, there were 10 offerings of debt capital, i.e. Term Finance Certificates
(TFCs), that highlights growing investor interest in these securities.
Table 2 ahead provides a comparison of share capital and TFC offerings during the year.
Table 2 -
Share Capital and TFC Offerings
(Rs. in million)
Year |
Share Capital |
Redeemable Capital | |||
| No. of Issues | Amount of Capital Offered (at face value) | No. of Issues | Amount Offered | Amount Retained | |
| 2000-2001 | 02 | 1,984.695 | 10 | 5,425.0 | 5,488.970 |
| 1999-2000 | 03 | 2,035.031 | 04 | 930.0 | 1,147.720 |
2.7.1 Share Capital
During the year under review, there was no offering of fresh equity capital.
However, four secondary offerings of shares were considered, of which two offerings were
finalized involving shares aggregating Rs. 212.50 million in value based on the offer
prices achieved. The total capital listed on the stock exchange was Rs. 1.985 billion. The
other two offerings considered, but not implemented, pertained to Government of Pakistan
(GOP) holdings in two listed companies being offered for sale by the Privatization
Commission.
Relevant particulars of the two secondary offerings of equity capital that were actually completed during the year under review are as follows:
Table 3 -
Secondary Offerings of Equity Capital
(Rs. in million)
| S.No. | Name of Company | Sector | Name of Offerer | Subscription Date | Formal Listing Date | Total Paid-up Capital | Offered Capital | Amount of Premium | Subscription Received (including premium) | Times Subscribed |
| 1 | Bestway Cement Ltd. | Cement | M/s Bestway (Holdings) Limited | 7-Feb-01 | 9-Apr-01 | 1,934.695 | 200.000 | 0.000 | 205.805 | 1.03 |
| 2 | Arif Habib Securities Ltd. | Securities companies/
banks/ investment companies |
Mr. Arif Habib | 24-May-01 | 25-June-01 | 50.000 | 12.500 | 87.500 | 434.640 | 4.35 |
| Total | 1,984.695 | 212.500 | 87.500 | 640.445 |
Particulars of the two privatization offerings that were not completed are given below:
Table 4 Privatization Offerings
| S.No. | Name of Company | Sector | Name of Offerer | Date of Approval | Total Paid-up Capital | Capital Offered for Sale | No. of Shares Offered (Million) |
| 1 | Muslim Commercial Bank. | Securities companies/ banks/investment companies | Govt. of Pakistan | 08-Dec-00 | 2,202.856 | 528.685 | 52.869 |
| 2 | Pakistan Oil Fields Ltd. | Fuel and Energy | Govt. of Pakistan | 07-May-01 | 456.300 | 158.590 | 15.859 |
| Total | 2,659.156 | 687.275 | 68.728 |
2.7.2 Further Issue of
Share Capital
Companies can issue further capital by way of pre-emptive rights and/or bonus
issues of shares without the approval of the Commission. However, in certain exceptional
circumstances listed companies may be allowed to further raise their capital without the
issue of right shares. In this regard, five applications were received, of which four were
approved.
During the year, it was observed that some companies had not complied with the
requirements of the Companies (Issue of Capital) Rules, 1996 while issuing bonus and right
shares. The total number of companies that had issued bonus and right shares was 69 and 35
respectively. 19 companies issuing right shares and four companies making bonus allotments
were asked to explain their failure to comply with the disclosure requirements prescribed
under the Rules.
2.7.3 Issue of Shares at Discount
Listed companies may issue shares at a discount if so approved by the Commission.
During the year, two companies were allowed to issue shares at 60 percent and 30 percent
discount, respectively.
2.7.4 Debt Capital
The year under review was the best so far in respect of raising of debt capital
by companies. Approvals were granted to 10 debt issues involving an aggregate of Rs. 8.9
billion. Of this amount, Rs. 5.489 billion (inclusive of green shoe option) has already
been raised; Rs. 4.295 billion placed privately and Rs. 1.194 billion through public
offering. Three companies will raise the remaining Rs. 3.475 billion in subsequent
tranches.
Investor interest in TFCs is, among other reasons, attributable to: (i) attractive returns
offered to TFC holders as compared to similar savings schemes of public and private
institutions; (ii) a substantial fall in returns under various National Savings Schemes;
and (iii) restrictions placed on institutional investors from investing in National
Savings Schemes.
Table 5 below summarizes the 10 debt issues during the year under review.
Table 5
Debt Issues
(Rs. in million)
| Year | Name of Company | Subscription Date | Formal Listing Date | Total Capital allowed to be issued | Present Offer | Subscription Received | Green Shoe Option | Amount Retained against public offer | ||||
| Pre-IPO | IPO | Total | Pre-IPO | IPO | Total | |||||||
| 1 | Atlas Lease Ltd. | 26-27 September, 2000 | 06-Nov-00 | 200.000 | 150.000 | 50.000 | 200.000 | 150.000 | 158.870 | 308.870 | N.A | 50.000 |
| 2 | Network Leasing Co. Ltd. | 03-04 October, 2000 | 24-Nov-00 | 100.000 | 60.000 | 40.000 | 100.000 | 60.000 | 68.450 | 128.450 | N.A | 40.000 |
| 3 | Al-Noor Sugar Mills Ltd. | 31st Oct-Ist Nov , 2000 | 13-Dec-00 | 200.000 | 125.000 | 75.000 | 200.000 | 125.000 | 78.660 | 203.660 | 40% of Public Offer | 78.660 |
| 4 | Nishat Mills | 19-20 Dec, 2000 | 06-Feb-01 | 350.000 | 255.000 | 95.000 | 350.000 | 255.000 | 87.870 | 342.870 | 30% of Total Issue | 87.870 |
| 5 | PILCORP (2nd Issue, Ist tranche of Rs. 1.0 billion) | 01-02 March, 2001 | 23-May-01 | 1,000.000 | 175.000 | 150.000 | 325.000 | 175.000 | 159.130 | 334.130 | 50% of Total Issue | 159.130 |
| 6 | Orix Leasing Pak. Ltd. (Ist tranche of authorized Rs. 1.5 billion) | 20 Mar-7 Apr , 2001 | 21-May-01 | 1,500.000 | 550.000 | 150.000 | 700.000 | 550.000 | 191.965 | 741.965 | 50% of Public Offer | 191.965 |
| 7 | Shakarganj Mills Ltd. | 09-10 Apr, 2001 | 28-May-01 | 250.000 | 180.000 | 70.000 | 250.000 | 180.000 | 70.365 | 250.365 | N.A | 70.000 |
| 8 | Sui Southern Gas Co. Ltd. (Ist tranche of authorized Rs. 3.0 billion) | 31 May-01 June, 2001 | 16-Jul-01 | 3,000.000 | 800.000 | 200.000 | 1,000.000 | 800.000 | 229.600 | 1,029.600 | N.A | 200.000 |
| 9 | Engro Asahi Chem. (Non listed Pub. Co.) | 14-15 June, 2001 | 13-Aug-01 | 500.000 | 400.000 | 100.000 | 500.00 | 400.000 | 106.825 | 506.825 | N.A | 100.000 |
| 10 | Dewan Salman Fibres | 21-22 June, 2001 | 06-Aug-01 | 1,800.000 | 1,600.000 | 200.000 | 1,800.00 | 1,600.000 | 216.350 | 1,816.350 | 125% of the public offer | 216.350 |
| Grand Total | 8,900.000 | 4,295.000 | 1,130.000 | 5,425.000 | 4,295.000 | 1,368.085 | 5,663.085 | 1,193.970 | ||||
Note: All issues except Nishat Mills Ltd. have been oversubscribed
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Home | About Us | Contact | Information Resources |